TẢI NGAY BỘ TRANH TÔ MÀU AMAZING SPIDER MAN 3 0), TRANH TÔ MÀU AMAZING SPIDER MAN 3

Topher Grace had a hilarious response lớn speculation about a return in Spider-Man: No Way Home, but his version of Venom actually had an intriguing concept.Bạn đang xem: Tranh tô màu amazing spider man 3


Bạn đang xem: Tranh tô màu amazing spider man 3

*

Sony Pictures

Contextually, the character’s labored inclusion remains one of the most famous examples of what can go wrong when a company strong-arms a director—in this case Sam Raimi—over creative choices. Raimi’s Spider-Man films were firing on all cylinders, creating unprecedented brand momentum—alongside contemporaries in Fox’s X-Men movies—for the burgeoning comic book movie genre. Nevertheless, he was facing pressure upon heading into the third film. While 2002’s original film was a monumental success that yielded $825 million worldwide, 2004’s Spider-Man 2—widely beloved as it may have been for its memorable onscreen scraps with Molina’s emotionally-potent Doc Ock—curiously came up short of its predecessor with $788.9 million. Thusly, producers were intent on reshaping Raimi’s original vision for the film, which originally would have seen his main villain, the Sandman (Church) complemented tangentially by the Vulture, a role for which Ben Kingsley was eyed.

As the story goes, producer & Marvel executive Avi Arad successfully pressured an initially reluctant, Venom-averse Raimi lớn instead use the character for an appearance, which ideally could have boost comic sales. Yet, it positioned the fan-favorite character as a subordinate on the narrative hierarchy lớn the main Sandman story, which bore a movie-dramatic narrative that stood in contrast from the comics, with the grain-shifting supervillain was revealed as the burglar who, years ago, killed Uncle Ben—albeit accidentally, và motivated by the humanistic desire to lớn afford caring for his terminally ill daughter. Yet, the film already seemed khổng lồ be full, especially with the trilogy-spanning storyline focused on the fated dissolution of Peter’s friendship with Harry Osborn (James Franco), & the inevitable climactic showdown between Spider-Man & a new Green Goblin, who seeks vengeance against the friend who he believes to lớn be his father’s killer.

Read more


Xem thêm: Lớp Học Của Anh Hùng Cấp S, Sự Trở Lại Của Anh Hùng Cấp Thảm Họa

*

Movies

As Spider-Man Rumors Persist, Andrew Garfield Reveals a Downside khổng lồ its Fame

By Joseph Baxter
*

Games

Marvel’s Spider-Man 2: Is Venom a Villain or Playable Antihero?

By Matthew Byrd

After some creative shuffling, the over result was a devastatingly disjointed Spider-Man 3 that, at its heart, centers on Peter Parker’s internal battle with his own growing hubris—in contrast lớn his self-torturous guilt in the previous film—as the public popularity of his web-swinging alter-ego reaches a fever pitch. Said battle becomes upgraded khổng lồ an extraterrestrial scale upon his accidental joining with the meteorite-landed symbiote, which takes shape as a đen version of his costume, yielding even more extraordinary abilities than he already possessed. However, while riding on the highest of highs, Peter’s life at the Daily Bugle makes him an enemy in fellow journalist Eddie Brock, who Peter exposed after he attempted to frame Spidey for crimes using giả photos; an act that landed Peter the staff position that Eddie coveted. Yet, what started as an unrelated side story at Peter’s workplace somehow becomes amalgamated with the film’s larger stakes—the Sandman & New Goblin—that necessarily dominate the film.

Ironically enough, Spider-Man 3‘s $894.9 million worldwide take would make it the highest-grossing entry of Raimi’s trilogy. Despite that, its version of Venom was an abject failure for numerous reasons, notably that the film became a clown car of tonally incompatible antagonists weighed down by disparate plot points. Indeed, in the brief amount of time devoted to his story, Venom hardly came across as the monstrous existential threat presented in the introductory comic story. The role also failed khổng lồ reflect the more nuanced comic elements of the character’s personality that eventually led to lớn a successful conversion into being an anti-hero. Moreover, even the aesthetic presentation of Grace joined with the symbiote as Venom was unimpressive and small. Yet, within the poetic parallels between Peter Parker and Eddie Brock was the nucleus of a potentially compelling storyline—one that could have come to fruition properly in the never-realized Spider-Man 4, instead of being sloppily rushed to lớn a pumpkin-bomb-incinerated conclusion in this film.

Regardless, fans have plenty of Venom (as played by Tom Hardy,) phối for the near future, with solo sequel Venom: Let There Be Carnage scheduled khổng lồ hit theaters on Friday, Oct. 1. Less than three months later, Spider-Man: No Way Home will bring multiverse mischief when it hits theaters on Dec. 17, trailed by Marvel Studios’ presumed follow-up, Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness on Mar. 15.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

x